I noticed a rant posted on TL today aimed at girls who go over to Turkish resorts and spend the summer season. They're being berated because they say it's boring and speaking as a person who has done it too, I'd say they're bang on the money.
Of course we have all seen such girls on our travels there. They are usually chavvy little tarts who would behave no differently at home. They wouldn't work at home, would drink themselves silly at home, have casual sex with any Tom Dick or Harry at home and probably get pregnant too. They'd fight with anyone who so much as dared to look at them the wrong way in the street, drunk or sober, at home too. It is a busman's holiday for them.
I have often discovered that such girls have mothers who are just older, carbon copies of them in whose footsteps they have simply followed. They have behaved in exactly the same way, and often still do. These girls are the now teenaged toddlers who were a few years ago casually parked up in buggies sleeping in bars and nightclubs while their mothers were whoring around, just as they are now. It's a simple case of monkey see and monkey do.
I wonder however, whether these girls are simply acting in the only way they know how to act, and have been raised to act? Maybe they are uncoth, poor and lacking in intelligence but at least they're getting to know the Turds they are in so-called relationships with. These Turds will also be around the same age as them and from a similar lowly social background with few opportunities for betterment available to them. Some might argue they have a lot in common.
So who is more stupid? Those girls or some of the daft, deluded women in their 40s, 50s and older who post on TL telling us that they have a "relationship" with a man in his 20s and that they are waiting for them while they do their military service, sending them money and gifts? Them or the naive, gullible, unworldlywise, needy women who hastily marry men who have fished them off the internet? Them or the bonkers Yanks who claim to be deeply in love with a Turd who can barely string a sentence together in English who they've only ever seen on a webcam?
Ask yourself that.
Of course we have all seen such girls on our travels there. They are usually chavvy little tarts who would behave no differently at home. They wouldn't work at home, would drink themselves silly at home, have casual sex with any Tom Dick or Harry at home and probably get pregnant too. They'd fight with anyone who so much as dared to look at them the wrong way in the street, drunk or sober, at home too. It is a busman's holiday for them.
I have often discovered that such girls have mothers who are just older, carbon copies of them in whose footsteps they have simply followed. They have behaved in exactly the same way, and often still do. These girls are the now teenaged toddlers who were a few years ago casually parked up in buggies sleeping in bars and nightclubs while their mothers were whoring around, just as they are now. It's a simple case of monkey see and monkey do.
I wonder however, whether these girls are simply acting in the only way they know how to act, and have been raised to act? Maybe they are uncoth, poor and lacking in intelligence but at least they're getting to know the Turds they are in so-called relationships with. These Turds will also be around the same age as them and from a similar lowly social background with few opportunities for betterment available to them. Some might argue they have a lot in common.
So who is more stupid? Those girls or some of the daft, deluded women in their 40s, 50s and older who post on TL telling us that they have a "relationship" with a man in his 20s and that they are waiting for them while they do their military service, sending them money and gifts? Them or the naive, gullible, unworldlywise, needy women who hastily marry men who have fished them off the internet? Them or the bonkers Yanks who claim to be deeply in love with a Turd who can barely string a sentence together in English who they've only ever seen on a webcam?
Ask yourself that.